|
unknow artist
Forjador of the Country, priest, leader and mason
|
ID: 43437
|
|
|
|
unknow artist
Related Paintings of unknow artist :. | Still life of a chocolate pot,teapot,sucrier,bowl,teajar,tea cups and saucers,and silver spoons,all upon a draped table top | Duchess Sophia Frederica of Mecklenburg-Schwerin | Celestial Procession with Indra Riding His Elephant | European city landscape, street landsacpe, construction, frontstore, building and architecture. 222 | Thakur Daulat Singh,His Minister,His Nephew and Others in a Council | Related Artists: Bartolomeo Suardic. 1465?C1530,was an Italian painter and architect, mainly active in his native Milan. He was born in Milan, the son of Alberto Suardi, but his biography remains unclear, and was long complicated by two "Pseudo-Bramantinos". He was trained by Donato Bramante, adopting a diminutive form of his master's name. This training gave him influences from by the Urbino quattrocento tradition of immobile realism, and later he assimilated some elements of the style of Leonardo, after he arrived in Milan, although in other respects he remained faithful to his training in the style of Central Italy. He is documented in late 1508 as helping in the decoration of the Vatican Stanze though nothing remains of his work there, and by 1509 he was back in Milan. His style changed considerably during his career, and also shows strongly individual traits. His main influences were the serene and sometimes unnatural quietist classicism of Piero della Francesca, Leonardo da Vinci, and Ercole de' Roberti Hieronymus Janssens1573 - 1632 Domenico Beccafumic1486-1551
Domenico Beccafumi Gallery
Italian painter, sculptor, draughtsman, printmaker and illuminator. He was one of the protagonists, perhaps even the most precocious, of Tuscan Mannerism, which he practised with a strong sense of his Sienese artistic background but at the same time with an awareness of contemporary developments in Florence and Rome. He responded to the new demand for feeling and fantasy while retaining the formal language of the early 16th century. None of Beccafumis works is signed or dated, but his highly personal maniera has facilitated almost unanimous agreement regarding the definition of his corpus and the principal areas of influence on it. However, some questions concerning the circumstances of his early career and the choices available to him remain unanswered. The more extreme forms of Beccafumis reckless experimentation underwent a critical reappraisal only in the later 20th century.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|